MCDOWELL v. FRED'S MARKET RIVERVIEW, LLC is a federal lawsuit classified as 442 Civil Rights: Jobs, brought under 28:451 Employment Discrimination. Filed 2026-02-27 in District Court, M.D. Florida.
Absolute 1 Transport LLC v. Medical Answering Services, LLC is a federal lawsuit classified as 710 Labor: Fair Standards, brought under 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act. Filed 2026-02-27 in District Court, S.D. New York. The case involves 5 parties including 3 additional parties beyond the named plaintiff and defendant.
Ilyaich v. Infinite Care Development, LLC is a federal lawsuit. Filed 2026-02-27 in District Court, S.D. New York.
A-to-Be USA LLC v. Deloitte Consulting, LLP is a federal lawsuit. Filed 2026-02-27 in District Court, S.D. New York.
Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Matos is a federal lawsuit classified as 470 Racketeer/Corrupt Organization, brought under 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act. Filed 2026-02-27 in District Court, M.D. Florida before Judge Thomas P. Barber. The case involves 18 parties including 16 additional parties beyond the named plaintiff and defendant.
Ramales Photography LLC v. MTV Networks Inc. is a federal lawsuit. Filed 2026-02-27 in District Court, S.D. New York.
Reno v. My Credit Guy, Inc. is a federal lawsuit classified as 480 Consumer Credit, brought under Civil Miscellaneous Case. Filed 2026-02-27 in District Court, M.D. Florida. The case involves 3 parties including 1 additional party beyond the named plaintiff and defendant.
Cascio v. The Michael Jackson Company, LLC is a federal lawsuit classified as 320 Assault Libel & Slander, brought under Civil Miscellaneous Case. Filed 2026-02-27 in District Court, C.D. California.
Reiser v. Federal Express Corporation is a federal lawsuit classified as 890 Other Statutory Actions, brought under 28:1331 Federal Question. Filed 2026-02-27 in District Court, S.D. Florida before Judge Jacqueline Becerra. The case involves 3 parties including 1 additional party beyond the named plaintiff and defendant.
Luminate Home Loans, Inc. v. EFK Appraisal Services, Inc. is a federal lawsuit classified as 380 Personal Property: Other, brought under 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract. Filed 2026-02-26 in District Court, C.D. California. The case involves 4 parties including 2 additional parties beyond the named plaintiff and defendant.
Ward v. EssilorLuxottica S.A. is a federal lawsuit classified as 890 Other Statutory Actions, brought under 28:1330 Breach of Contract. Filed 2026-02-26 in District Court, E.D. New York before Judge Ramon E. Reyes Jr.. The case involves 4 parties including 2 additional parties beyond the named plaintiff and defendant.
One William Street Capital Master Fund Ltd. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association is a federal lawsuit classified as 370 Other Fraud, brought under 15:78j(b)ss Stockholder Suit. Filed 2026-02-26 in District Court, S.D. New York. The case involves 36 parties including 34 additional parties beyond the named plaintiff and defendant.
Moses v. Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. is a federal lawsuit classified as 850 Securities/Commodities, brought under 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act. Filed 2026-02-26 in District Court, E.D. New York before Judge Brian M. Cogan. The case involves 5 parties including 3 additional parties beyond the named plaintiff and defendant.
J.P. v. Oregon Youth Authority is a federal lawsuit classified as 440 Civil Rights: Other, brought under 42:1983 Civil Rights Act. Filed 2026-02-25 in District Court, D. Oregon before Judge Ann L. Aiken. The case involves 26 parties including 24 additional parties beyond the named plaintiff and defendant.
Poe v. Harris-Madden is a federal lawsuit classified as 440 Civil Rights: Other, brought under 42:1983 Civil Rights Act. Filed 2026-02-26 in District Court, S.D. New York before Judge George B. Daniels. The case involves 6 parties including 4 additional parties beyond the named plaintiff and defendant.
Pre-litigation investigation into atmospheric geoengineering and aerial contamination. The Blake Horwitz Law Firm, in collaboration with attorneys Tom Renz and Nicole Pearson, is pursuing federal litigation challenging geoengineering programs alleged to contaminate the air. The firm is gathering evidence of atmospheric contamination, health impacts, and potential regulatory violations. This pre-litigation matter seeks factual and legal analysis to support claims under environmental, tort, and constitutional law.
Maritime shipping company King Ocean Services sues Ameritrans Worldwide Logistics for claims arising from international freight and logistics operations. The dispute involves bills of lading, shipping terms, and alleged breaches of freight forwarding obligations. Filed in the S.D. Fla. The case raises issues of maritime commerce and international shipping law.
Student Ava Vona sues the Lower Moreland Township School District, school officials Justin Thomas and William Miles, and a Jane Doe defendant under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for civil rights violations. The complaint alleges the school district and its employees violated the plaintiff's constitutional rights. Filed in the E.D. Pa. The case involves student rights and institutional liability.
Pennsylvania produce distributor Scarff Bros. sues Maine-based Heartstone Farm for breach of contract in a diversity action. The complaint alleges the defendant failed to fulfill obligations under a commercial supply or purchase agreement, causing financial damages. Filed in the E.D. Pa. The case involves interstate commercial disputes and contract enforcement.
Sybil Angone sues the City of Chicago alleging employment discrimination in violation of federal civil rights law. The complaint raises claims under Title VII and related statutes, alleging the city engaged in unlawful employment practices including potential discrimination based on a protected characteristic. Filed in the N.D. Ill. before Judge Martha M. Pacold.
Andrew Donoho and Gloria Ferguson bring a statutory action against telehealth company Hims & Hers Health and its subsidiary Hims, Inc. The complaint alleges unlawful business practices in the marketing and sale of health products or prescription medications through the company's online platform. Filed in the N.D. Ill.
Liberty Access Technologies Licensing LLC sues Chinese electronics manufacturer Anker Innovations Technology for patent infringement. The complaint alleges Anker's consumer electronics products infringe patents related to wireless charging or power delivery technology. Filed in the E.D. Tex., a jurisdiction frequently chosen for patent litigation.
Atrius Development Group sues ABC IP LLC and Rare Breed Triggers for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 100 et seq. The complaint alleges the defendants manufacture and sell products that infringe one or more of Atrius's patents. Filed in the W.D. Tex. before Judge David Counts. The case involves firearms-related technology patents.
Multiple Trump-affiliated entities sue JPMorgan Chase Bank and CEO James Dimon in a contract dispute removed to federal court on diversity grounds. The plaintiffs—including Trump golf clubs, hotel ventures, and a payroll corporation—allege the bank improperly terminated or restricted banking relationships. Filed in the S.D. Fla. before Judge Kathleen M. Williams.
Shareholder Kerry Masters brings a securities fraud action against PepsiCo, Inc. under the Securities Exchange Act. The complaint alleges the company made materially false and misleading statements regarding its financial condition or business operations, causing investor losses. Filed in the S.D.N.Y. The case involves federal securities law and corporate disclosure obligations.
Crocus Bay Development sues RECAP AXA Villa Holdings in a breach of contract action removed to federal court on diversity jurisdiction. The dispute involves a real estate development agreement and alleges the defendant failed to perform contractual obligations. Filed in the E.D. Pa. The case raises contract interpretation questions in a commercial real estate context.
Apple Inc. seeks a declaratory judgment of non-infringement against Cloud Controls LLC in a patent dispute. The complaint asks the court to declare that Apple's products and services do not infringe patents held by the defendant. Filed in the N.D. Cal., this case involves intellectual property rights in the technology sector and cloud computing patents.
Kourtney Pearson, a federal employee, sues FBI Director Kashyap Patel and the United States under the Administrative Procedure Act, seeking judicial review of an agency personnel decision. The case involves claims of unlawful termination or adverse action and challenges to the agency's compliance with federal employment law and due process requirements. Filed in the D.D.C.
Environmental nonprofit Grandmothers Growing Goodness and the Wilderness Society challenge Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum and Bureau of Land Management officials over federal land management decisions. The complaint alleges violations of the Administrative Procedure Act and federal environmental statutes, seeking judicial review of agency actions affecting public lands. Filed in the D.D.C.
The Endocrine Society, a medical professional organization, sues the Federal Trade Commission and Chair Andrew Ferguson, alleging unlawful interference with scientific speech and advocacy. The complaint raises First Amendment and APA claims related to FTC actions targeting the society's public statements on endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Filed in the D.D.C. before Chief Judge James E. Boasberg.
The United States Association of Reptile Keepers challenges a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service rule under the Lacey Act restricting interstate transport of certain constrictor snakes. Plaintiffs argue the rule exceeds statutory authority and violates the Administrative Procedure Act. Filed in the D.D.C. before Judge Trevor N. McFadden. The case raises questions about federal wildlife regulation and agency rulemaking power.
Four preservation advocates challenge President Trump and federal officials for dismantling the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and terminating the National Historic Preservation Fund. Plaintiffs allege violations of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Administrative Procedure Act, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to restore federally mandated historic preservation programs. Filed in the D.D.C. before Judge Tanya S. Chutkan.